Proskauer Rose LLP - Kenneth Rubenstein - Perjured Deposition by Proskauer Rose Attorney

Judge Orders Depositions In Proskauer Malpractice Suit - Ascent Media Group LLC - Proskauer Rose LLP, William Frazee, Judge Robert L. Hess - Janel Ablon of Littler Mendelson PC

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:44:00 +0000

"Judge Orders Depositions In Proskauer Malpractice Suit

Law360, Los Angeles (July 13, 2011) -- A California state judge ruled Wednesday that in-house attorneys for Ascent Media Group LLC must provide depositions as part of a former executive's malpractice suit against Proskauer Rose LLP over the firm's alleged conflict of interest during two sexual harassment investigations.

William Frazee claims Proskauer had a conflict of interest in representing both him and Ascent in the investigations, both of which were resolved in mediation but later led to a dispute between Frazee and his employer over fees stemming from the proceedings.

While Judge Robert L. Hess granted Frazee's request for depositions, he refused to compel Ascent attorneys William Niles and Niloofar Shepherd to produce documents related to the investigations.

He also denied a motion to depose Jackie Lee, a vice president at Ascent. Frazee's attorney, Samuel J. Smith of SJS Counsel APC, argued that Lee — who allegedly declined to have Frazee investigated for a third sexual harassment claim — could show that Proskauer did not do a thorough job defending Frazee against the allegations. But Judge Hess said Lee's alleged decisions not to have a claim against Frazee investigated had nothing to do with the legal malpractice accusation.

“This argument you're making has no logical force, frankly,” Judge Hess told Smith before delivering his ruling. “I'm thoroughly unimpressed.”

The mixed ruling could shed more light on Proskauer's alleged conflict of interest and comes almost seven months after Frazee sued the firm.

Frazee claims Proskauer failed to inform him of attorneys' fees liabilities during the two sexual harassment arbitration hearings and other legal matters. In doing so, Proskauer put the interests of Ascent ahead of Frazee, the lawsuit alleges.

Former Ascent employee Carrie Zuzenak sued the company and Frazee for sexual harassment in 2006, and that case, which was handled by Proskauer, was settled in mediation and Frazee was given a reprimand by the company, according to the complaint.

Then in March 2010, another employee, Addie Hall, sued Ascent and Frazee for sexual harassment, according to the suit. Both sides in Hall's case agreed to mediation in July 2010, and Frazee was given another reprimand, according to the complaint.

In November, Ascent filed its own arbitration claim against Frazee, claiming the lawsuits and arbitration proceedings were outside the scope of his employment and that he must reimburse the company for $500,000 in attorneys' fees, expenses and settlement payments.

Frazee alleges in his lawsuit against Ascent that Proskauer failed to advise him to seek independent legal counsel and that attorneys failed to obtain a release from Ascent for legal fees. Frazee also claims Proskauer improperly settled two proceedings without his consent.

Proskauer's attorney, Janel Ablon of Littler Mendelson PC, argued that discovery in the malpractice lawsuit should be stayed until after arbitration proceedings between Frazee and Ascent were done, but Judge Hess said he wanted to make sure the lawsuit was not stalled.

Ablon told the judge Niles and Shepherd would be ready for depositions in August.

Frazee is represented Samuel J. Smith of SJS Counsel APC.

Proskauer is represented by Janel Ablon of Littler Mendelson PC.

The case is Frazee v. Proskauer Rose LLP et al., case number BC452417, in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles. "

Source of Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Attorney Post
http://www.law360.com/articles/257919/judge-orders-depositions-in-proskauer-malpractice-suit

Proskauer Rose Lawyers are Famous for Getting away with Perjured Depositions, So Watch for This.

Got A Tip on This Case or on Proskauer Malpractice Suit, Proskauer Rose LLP, William Frazee, Ascent Media Group, Judge Robert L. Hess, Niloofar Shepherd, William Niles - email your tip to Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose does nothing to "Clean Up" Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Why?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:58:00 +0000

Proskauer Rose has been involved in a major scandal for over a Decade. The FBI, Department of Justice, SEC, Florida Supreme Court, Florida State Bar, New York Supreme Court, New York Bar and more have known about this massive fraud for over a decade.

Now the Solution that Proskauer Rose LLP has come up with in order to STOP the Truth from getting to shareholders and investigators is to take the domain names of an investigative blogger, me ~ Crystal L. Cox. Though I have done nothing but EXPOSE the TRUTH about Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Proskauer Rose is named in SEC Complaint, what is Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose's new "Head Guy" doing to investigate this? The solution seems to be to try and intimidate an investigative blogger to cover up decades of secrets, crimes, scandals and cover ups of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

When Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose should really take a look at ALL the documents, evidence of the iViewit Technologies Case, as there is proof on top of proof of Proskauer Rose attorneys involvement and it is without a doubt a major Liability to Proskauer Rose.

There is no way to look at all the evidence against Proskauer Rose in the iViewit Stolen Technology case and to not see that Proskauer Rose attorneys are GUILTY. So why is Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose putting his career on the line as new "Head Guy" to support criminals that are now under his management ???

Taking the Domain Names of an Investigative Blogger will now STOP the Truth. There is too much evidence proving the Real Facts of the Stolen iViewit Technology and the Involvement of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Here are Some Links to Educate Joseph Leccese, Head Guy at Proskauer Rose Law Firm on the major liability of Proskauer Rose over the Stolen iViewit Technology, in which Joseph Leccese seems to have been lied about by Proskauer Rose attorneys involved such as Kenneth Rubenstein, Matthew Triggs and former Proskauer Rose Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler.

SEC Complaint Naming Proskauer Rose with Details as to what REALLY Happened

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

Proskauer Rose Liability information

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Appendix%20A/index.htm#proskauer

Kenneth Rubenstein's Perjured Deposition

http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#grid/user/3BFA906636FA9889

Proskauer Rose Crime Chart

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CRIME%20ORG%20CHARTS%201.htm

Gregg Mashberg Knows of Fraud and the Connections to Whistleblower Cases

in High Courts of New York

http://www.stephenlamont.com/2010/10/proskauer-rose-llp-gregg-m-mashberg.html

Proskauer Rose Sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over Iviewit Stolen Technology

http://www.free-press-release.com/pdf/download/200909/1252249099.pdf

Information on this Case related to a major Whistleblower Case out of New York

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/01/twelve-trillion-dollar-federal-rico.html

Proskauer Rose MPEG LA Lawyer Sued Over Patents

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060119/1225216.shtml

http://iviewit.tv/

Lots of Documents, Videos and Information on the FACTS of the Case, should Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose take a good look at the real risk Proskauer Rose face over this 10 year plus case.

Other Links on Proskauer Rose involved in Major Technology Theft

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/shareholders.pdf

http://rate.forbes.com/comments/CommentServlet?op=TPage&pageNumber=1&tagName=iviewit

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/iviewit-news-story.html

There are over 1200 Documents Online, and massive prove in many federal agencies, federal courts, state bars and for some reason all are protecting Proskauer Rose Law Firm and NOT protecting the Rights of the United States Inventors which is a Constitutional Right. Proskauer Rose is NOT above the Law unless everyone ignores the blatant evidence that proves that Proskauer Rose did in FACT commit these crime and is liable without a doubt for a 13 Trillion Dollar technology theft.

Proskauer Rose LLP Gregg M. Mashberg Knows FULL Well that Stephen Lamont has NO Right to Speak on Behalf of iViewit.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:43:00 +0000

Proskauer Rose Law Firm Knows that Stephen Lamont has NO LEGAL Right to Speak on Behalf of iViewit.

So why is the Corrupt Law Firm of Proskauer Rose Responding to an Illegal Filing by Stephen Lamont on Behalf of Iviewit Technologies?

Could it be that Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose is doing this to deliberately fraud the courts, as Stephen Lamont is VERY Connected to Judith Kaye, ex-supreme court judge who was married to Proskauer Rose Partner Stephen Kaye - and Judith Kaye use to Work at IBM and is connected with William Dick who also use to work at IBM and is connected to the Iviewit Patent Suppression and iViewit Invention Theft.

So it seems to me that New York Attorney Gregg M. Mashberg, Proskauer Rose Law Firm is deliberately frauding the courts and the motive seems to me to be to cause further stalling of the Iviewit Technology patent and to further prolong the Federal RICO Lawsuit against Proskauer Rose, the Criminal Complaint and SEC Complaint Against Proskauer Rose and to Protect the Corrupt MPEG LA to keep making Billions a year on a technology that Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP knew he had stolen for MPEG LA over a Decade Ago.

So why is this all going on Right Now?

What is P. Stephen Lamont up to with Gregg M. Mashberg and the Pro Se Party over there at the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm?

Eliot Bernstein did Not initiate this at this Time, P. Stephen Lamont did and P. Stephen Lamont has No Legal Right to Speak for Eliot Bernstein, nor does P. Stephen Lamont have a right to speak for the iViewit Investors or the iViewit Inventors.

For Proskauer Rose LLP to Continue in this scam, they are blatantly playing games on Judge Shira Scheindlin and making a mockery out of the New York Courts. Gregg M. Mashberg, Proskauer Rose is Doing This Deliberately to confuse the issue and to keep Stephen Lamont involved somehow. All the Motives here are Unclear, and well it is not like YOU can Complain to the New York Bar - as Proskauer Rose LLP controls the New York Bar.

Stephen Lamont is Under Investigation for Fraudulently Representing iViewit and other Suspected Illegal Activities and though Gregg M. Mashberg and Proskauer Rose LLP KNOW this, still Gregg M. Mashberg files this JOKE on the New York Courts, Why?

Gregg M. Mashberg - Proskauer Rose LLP

Just How Corrupt is Gregg M. Mashberg - I mean Come on Stephen Lamont ILLEGALLY Files a "Bernstein Vs. Appellate Division First Department..." and Even though Gregg Mashberg, Proskauer Rose LLP Attorney KNOWS that P. Stephen Lamont has No Right to Do so, Still Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP has a RESPONSE Delivered?

A Hand Delivered Response from Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Proskauer Rose LLP, Attorney Gregg M. Mashberg RESPONDS to P. Stephen Lamont's Fraudulent Court Filings on Behalf of iViewit when Gregg M. Mashberg - Proskauer Rose LLPAttorrney knows that Stephen Lamont has no Right to be filing anything on behalf of iViewit.

Proskauer Rose LLP, Gregg M. Mashberg Attorneys Pro Se for Proskauer Rose LLP
and Attorneys for Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane and and the Estate of Steven Rackow Kaye .. and "Respectfully Submitted" - that is BULL - it is Lies and Cover Ups and no Respect Intended..

The Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP is Still representing themselves in the Iviewit Stolen Technology Case. Odd that 2 of the Above Attorneys have Died, and they are VERY Guilty of Stealing a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent. And yet still Proskauer Ross LLP seems to Run the New York Justice System and Get Their Way.

There is Tons of Proof on Proskauer Rose's Guilt in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technologies Invention and in Proskauer Roses Law Firm using this to Entice Enron, which led to the Collapse of Enron and Billions Lost to Investors. Which is the Same thing that Will Soon happen at Intel Corp. , Time Warner, Warner Bros., SONY, Lockheed Martin, and More..

So what is Gregg M. Mashberg and the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm Really Up to with this, the Latest Stunt in the Decade Old Saga of Proskauer Rose Patent Thieves for MPEG LA.

Click Here for Eliot Bernstein iViewit Technology SEC Complaint Against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Stephen Kaye, MPEG LA and many others...

Got a Tip on Gregg M. Mashberg or Proskauer Rose LLP ?
eMail me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Perjured Deposition Proskauer Rose - MPEG LA for Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:16:00 +0000

Part 1
Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition
Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein.

Kenneth Rubenstein - Patent Attorney Proskauer Rose Partner

Hear More on Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein at Eliot Bernstein's Iviewit Technologies Channel - Click Here

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com

Christopher C. Wheeler, Matthew Triggs - Proskauer Rose Frauds the Florida Supreme Court. What is Proskauer Rose man in charge Joseph Leccese Doing About it ?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:27:00 +0000

Christopher Clark Wheeler - Proskauer Rose LLP Corrupt Patent Attorney, Protected by Proskauer Rose Law Firm, the Florida and New York Supreme Court.

" Take a moment to honor the original conspirator, Christopher Clark Wheeler, one of the main suspects and ringleaders of the crime who has subsequently been charged with a Felony Driving Under the Influence Charge with Injury making his credibility as an attorney further mired in crimes.

An arrest warrant was been issued in that matter, click Wheeler's picture on the left for the Delray Beach Police Department report or this link -Wheeler's arrest report or this one for the PD blotter.

So where his more serious crimes, like fraud on a whole bunch of government agencies and foreign nations now landed Iviewit and its shareholders at the United States Supreme Court to present our case for violations of public office by Chris Wheeler and Matthew Triggs, Wheeler going with this further public nuisance crime upon his head.

Christophe Wheeler, the main protagonist, the first attorney to revel the inventions and be disclosed the processes, is found recklessly endangering lives, now drunk and a true danger to himself and society.

In addition, the Petition filed by Iviewit contained allegations and evidence that linked the President of the Florida Bar and others to conflicts.

The Florida Supreme Court ordered a response to the Petition by the Florida Bar and what was set forth in response was perhaps the most incompetent legal response (Illiterate Florida Bar Response to Petition) ever by the Florida Bar, authored by Eric Turner - Chief Branch Officer, and Eric Turner completed law school.

Authored with a complaint filed against him, which should have precluded his response in conflict, yet Turner so stressed out writes a letter that is legally and intelligibly incoherent, even addressing the Florida Supreme Court improperly and this is a Chief Counsel of The Florida Bar.

For this letter alone Eric Turner should have been sent back to law school.

Turners response fails to address any of the allegations in the Petition as demanded by the SCF order and instead states that the Florida Barreview work was done well.

The problem, the review was done and included responses tendered byMatthew Triggs as attorney for his partner Wheeler, while Matthew Triggs was in a confirmed black-out period at the Florida Bar where he was unable to represent any party due to his public office position with the Florida Bar.

Iviewit filed with the SCF a rebuttal identifying the Florida Bar failure to address the questions in the Petition and asking for a default judgment and also due to Turner's response failing to properly identify parties including the SCF, Rebuttal Response.

Further, the exhibits in the illiterate response done by Eric Turner which contain the Florida Bar reviewers (no investigation was undertaken) assessment of the Wheeler complaint, are all invalid, as Wheeler's responses where all tendered by Matthew Triggs in conflict but what is interesting to note is how each reviewer attempts to claim that they found no wrong doing or that Proskauer Rose was not patent counsel.

Without any investigation, the Florida Bar is not allowed by their own rules to make any opinions in favor of either party and may only decline to undertake investigation.

Yet, the conflicts, unknown and concealed by Christopher Wheeler andMatthew Triggs had worked there magic and influenced the Florida Bar to attempt to write exculpatory language on behalf of Proskauer Rose, one wonders what the cost of buying off justice cost.

The Florida Bar acting more as a defacto attorney protection agency versus a consumer organization, where even after being caught inconflicts and violations of public office - attorneys remain not prosecuted and where citizen complaints to The Florida Bar have been denied being filed quite inapposite the intent of the Florida Constitution in creating a bar and inapposite of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.

When citizens are denied the right to complain about elected officials violating clearly established laws inapposite the rules of procedure, it is reminiscent of the former Soviet Union.

Shocking but true, just look up the case and watch it as it now is up for appeal at the United States Supreme Court and there is more corruption following, this time a similar series of conflicts of interest, improprieties and abuses of public office in New York, where court ordered investigations have been derailed and other miscellaneous fodder. "

Source of Above
http://iviewit.tv/about/index.htm

Proskauer Rose LLP - Chris Wheeler Crimes

Exhibit 4 – Utley Resume as submitted by Christopher Wheeler to I View It and Board

Exhibit 19 – How to steal an applet, first act, Brian invention at home is 2nd attempt after this is foiled

******

Wheeler response to The initial small form Florida Bar complaint

Iviewit rebuttal to Wheeler response to The Florida Bar #1

some wheeler perjury to florida bar goes well with dui and somehow evades detection

******

matthew triggs - florida bar complaint - florida bar and florida supreme court refuse to docket formally the complaint although it has affirmed violations of triggs public office as a member of the florida bar and conflicting his representation of wheeler. currently under review at the united states supreme court.

supreme court of florida - iviewit original filing

florida bar response to supreme court order to respond to petition

fails to deal with any substantive issues of the petition and as such stands in default. they claim to have done a good review to the supreme court and where such review contained conflicted responses from triggs, that would have invalidated the prior reviews.

response is unintelligible and addresses parties incorrectly such as (this court) when more appropriately (this Court) and other such defined term problems.

iviewit rebuttal to florida bar non-response - supreme court of florida
florida bar response - another turner classic

Of interest -- inventor Bernstein has since discovery of the inventions told of how the inventions came to be as coming in dreams as gifts from G0D to help your children save the planet. This makes the crimes even more insidious, to read of this fascinating truth of how these inventions came to be visit the inventor.

More on the Corrupt Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler
http://www.christophercwheeler.com/

Proskauer Rose Law Firm involved in Major Video Technology Theft. Is Joseph Leccese, Head of Proskauer Rose doing anything?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:23:00 +0000

"MPEG LA involved in Major Video Technology Theft. MPEG LA LLC stole the Iviewit Video Technology

Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General.

More Iviewit Proof of Fraud and MPEG LA Involvement. Proskauer Rose LLP Corruption. Patent Fraud ?

June 10, 1999 - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General

" Carey R. Ramos, Esq.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison

1285 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10019-6064

Dear Mr. Ramos:

This letter is in response to your request on behalf of Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Time Warner Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (collectively, the "Licensors"), for the issuance of a business review letter pursuant to the Department of Justice's Business Review Procedure, 28 C.F.R. § 50.6.

You have requested a statement of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement intentions with respect to a proposed arrangement pursuant to which Toshiba will assemble and offer a package license under the Licensors' patents that are "essential," as defined below, to manufacturing products in compliance with the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats and will distribute royalty income to the other Licensors.

I. The DVD-ROM and DVD-Video Formats

The Standard Specifications for the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats describe the physical and technical parameters for DVDs for read-only-memory and video applications, respectively, and "rules, conditions and mechanisms" for player units for the two formats.

(1) In either format, the DVD has more than seven times the storage capacity of a compact disc; a single-layer, single-sided DVD, for example, can store 4.7 billion bytes (4.38 GB) of information including audio, video, text, and data. Employing compression technology, a DVD-Video disc can hold a 135-minute feature film on a single side.

The Licensors, along with a number of other producers of consumer electronics hardware, software, or both,

(2) established the Standard Specifications.

(3) These Standard Specifications appear to implicate the intellectual property rights of numerous firms.

II. The Proposed Arrangement

A memorandum of understanding among the Licensors (the "MOU," attached as Exhibit 1 to your letter) sets forth the central terms of the proposed arrangement, pursuant to which Toshiba will aggregate the Licensors' "essential" patents and disseminate rights under them to makers of Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), DVD players, and DVD decoders

(4) ("DVD Products"), and distribute royalty income to the other Licensors. The arrangement will be carried out through a group of other agreements, including:

(1) a license that Toshiba will receive from each other Licensor to enable Toshiba to license users of the Standard Specifications under that Licensor's "essential" patents (the "Authorization Agreement," attached as Exhibit 3); (2) Toshiba's sublicense to makers of DVD Products under the Licensors' patents (the "DVD Patent License," attached as Exhibit 2);

(3) an agreement among the Licensors concerning the retention and authority of experts to select and evaluate the patents to be licensed (the "Expert Agreement," attached as Exhibit 4); and

(4) the "Ground Rules for Royalty Allocation" (attached as Exhibit 7), which set forth the formula that will determine how Toshiba will distribute royalties among the Licensors.

(5) A. The patents to be licensed In the MOU, the Licensors commit to license each other and third parties to make, use and sell DVD Products under their present and future patents that are "essential" to doing so.

(6) The Licensors agree to two separate means of carrying out this obligation. First, they agree to grant Toshiba the right to sublicense third parties under their present and future "essential" patents for these purposes, and Toshiba agrees in turn to sublicense those patents, along with its own such patents, in the DVD Patent Licenses.

(7) Second, each Licensor agrees to "offer to license its essential DVD patents on a non-exclusive basis to interested third-party licensees pursuant to separate negotiations on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, whether or not said third-party licensees intend to make, use and sell DVD products that are in conformity with the Specifications."

(8) A Licensor's patent is "essential," and thus subject to the commitments in the MOU, if it is "necessarily infringed," or "there is no realistic alternative" to it, "in implementing the DVD Standard Specifications."

(9) Initially, each Licensor will identify its own "essential" patents in an attachment to its Authorization Agreement with Toshiba.

(10) Toshiba will then incorporate those patents in a list attached to the DVD Patent License.

(11) Shortly, however, an expert individual or panel, with "full and sufficient knowledge and skill in the relevant technology,"

(12) will complete a review the patents each Licensor has designated as "essential" in order to determine whether they satisfy the MOU criteria.

(13).MOU, ¶ 8; Expert Agreement, preamble.

(14) At that time, any patent initially designated by a Licensor for inclusion in the DVD Patent License that the expert determines is not "essential" will be excluded from subsequent DVD Patent Licenses, although current licensees will have the option to retain it in their existing licenses.

(15) The expert will repeat this comprehensive review of all the patents in the DVD Patent License portfolio every four years.

(16) In between the quadrennial reviews, the proposed program also provides a mechanism by which the expert may review individual patents whose essentiality comes into question. If a Licensor comes to a good faith conclusion that a licensed patent is not "essential," and provides a reasonable basis for that belief, the expert will re-examine the patent.

(17) If the expert concludes that the patent is not "essential," the patent will be excluded from the DVD Patent License.

(18) The agreement provides that the expert's determinations are "conclusive and non-appealable," although the expert must submit a report explaining any decision that a patent was not "essential."

(19) Compensation will be at the expert's "standard hourly rates."

(20) Each Licensor will bear the cost of the expert's review of its patents; the Licensors will share costs attributable to all of them, such as time spent reviewing the DVD Standard Specifications.

(21) The expert, although retained by the Licensors and selected by a majority vote among them, will not have an economic affiliation with any individual Licensor.

(22) A majority of the Licensors may remove the expert for failure or inability to perform the duties set forth in the Expert Agreement "in a professional, competent, reliable or timely manner."

(23) Although the proposed licensing program currently includes the patents of only the Licensors, it is open to any owner of an "essential" patent willing to license on the program's terms and conditions.(24)

Full Letter and Source of Post

http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/busreview/2485.htm

Save and Print the Above for Your Records.

Note: over the Last year of Writing on iViewt the companies at the top of this post have been all over my Blogs, they Ignore what is happening because the UPSTO, US Judges, Corrupt Law Firms like Foley and Lardner and ALL on my blog at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ seem to be protected by US Billionaires and Politicians. THEY knwo that the Massive Shareholder Liability is Inevitable and Are Protecting themselve from it.

No ONE is Protecting Investors or Inventors.

More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud Coming Soon to a Pocket Book near You.

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

GOOG, MPEG LA LLC,

Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose Perjures his Deposition, and is involved in Major Patent Fraud and Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose LLP Does Nothing ?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:18:00 +0000

"Enter William Dick of Foley to Replace Raymond Joao - Misrepresentation, Fraud, Lies, Deceit, IBM Connections - Kenneth Rubenstein Corruption -

"Once Raymond Joao was under “investigation” by Proskauer Rose he was then terminated from service by them, Proskauer instantly found an old friend of Christopher Wheeler’s, a one William Dick of Foley and Christopher Wheeler vouched for his friend William Dick to the Board of Directors.

William Dick, according to Christopher C. Wheeler was IBM’s Patent Counsel for IBM’s far eastern patent pool.

William Dick was also friends and former coworker at IBM and then again with Friedkin with another of Christopher Wheeler’s referrals to the Iviewit companies, Brian G. Utley, who was appointed President of the Iviewit companies whereby Christopher Wheeler had presented afalsified resume for Brian Utley to the Board, Shareholders and Investors, a falsified resume in several key ways.

First, the resume presented to the Board by Christopher Wheeler andProskauer Rose claimed Brian Utley was a college graduate, in deposition Brian Utley utterly denies ever graduating.

The most important fraud on the resume though was on the point of his past employmentwhereby it stated that due to Brian Utley’s innovations for the company, Diamond Turf Equipment, owned by Monte Friedkinhad grown to be one of the best and largest companies of its kind due to Brian Utley’s running that company.

Per Monte Friedkin, it was more like ruining the company, as when Monte Friedkin found Brian Utley, William Dick and Christopher Wheeler stealing Inventions from him, he fired Utley and closed the shop entirely down taking a several million dollar loss.

Major misrepresentation of Brian Utley by Proskauer’s Christopher C. Wheeler but even more astonishing is that the same crew of Brian Utley, Christopher Wheeler and William Dick were involved in the Monte Friedkin frauds.

Many perjured statements regarding these events were submitted to official investigatory bodies and courts and evidence of these perjurious statements have been included in the Exhibit and Linkage Section under the individuals names.

Prior to learning of their seedy past, which had been misrepresented to the Board, Investors and Shareholders, as neither Williamm Dick nor Christopher Wheeler disclosed their past historytogether at Friedkin’s with Brian G. Utley, nor did they share the information of the failed invention theft with anyone else.

Of course, if they did disclose the attempted theft, nobody would have retained them; everyone was in the dark as they handed out falsified resumes and financials to Investment Bankers, Iviewit Investors, Iviewit Shareholders, including the SBA and more.

Foley entered the scene under similar false pretenses with Christopher Wheeler vouching for William Dick’s integrity and again failing to notify anyone of their prior failed invention theft.

Instantly, Foley identified a mass of problems with Raymond Joao’s filing but claimed they could correct everything, such as missing assignments, missing inventors, missing patent disclosure information, etc.

Again, I myself and the Iviewit Board and Shareholders trusted yet another large law firmin the IP field referred again by Proskauer Rose and this time Foley assured Investors, Investment Banks and Shareholders that they could and would fix the problems with Raymond Joao’s filing and so they were retained, again, Proskauer’s Kenneth Rubenstein as oversight.

After several months, Brian Utley came to me and asked me to sign blank patent applications for filings the inventors had not reviewed, Brian Utley claiming they needed to be filed that day, which again was false, as they were not due for several days, Brian Utley persisting that the Inventors had no time for review and that he did not have the IP filing applications to review before signing and could not get them.

Noticing several large patent binders on his desk I went to pick them up with another founder and inventor of the Iviewit technologies, James Frazier Armstrong, and what was discovered inside them was both astonishing and criminal.

Inside the binders were intellectual property filings with now Brian Utley as sole inventor of technologies including for example an application titled “Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera” and another“Zoom Image Design Applet” both inventions of which Brian Utley was not even employed at the time of invention.

Further, Brian Utley replaced original inventors on original patent filings, those filed incorrectly by Raymond Joao, Foley fraudulently replacing inventors Zakirul Shirajee and Jude Rosario with Brian Utley on filings, again Brian Utley was nowhere near the scene of invention.

Foley now found continuing the Joao fraud it appeared although at the time hard for almost anyone to believe.

Further, there were now two or more sets of patents, which almost were identical but were wholly different, as one set missed the inventions entirely and was fraught with bad math and major errors, the others with Utley’s name seemed to be the broader and more correct filings.

In fact, some of the IP found in the binders taken from Brian Utley were for Intellectual Properties already filed at US Patent Office without anyone’s knowledge, including the Inventors, Shareholders or the Board of Directors, patents that were solely ( or soullessly ) in Utley’s name, being sent to his home address, not Iviewit’s and more.

Almost identical to the Monte Friedkin theft whereby William Dick wrote Friedkin’s inventions into Brian Utley’s name and filed them into a corporation incorporated byProskauer Rose and Christopher Wheeler, outside Friedkin’s employ and without Friedkin’s knowledge or consent.

These fraudulent applications led to immediate taped meetings regarding the fraudulent IP with Foley and Proskauer Partners, Board Members and Shareholders where it was further learned that assignments were missing, inventors were wrong and the patent applications remained filled with errors, I submit to the Committee under the Exhibits and Linkage section of the prepared statement a sample of the IP errors, contained in William Dick’s Virginia Bar Complaint Rebuttal.

Foley was to correct everything in time for the filings, the inventors then corrected the patents, and yet Foley still filed the fraudulent patents with the bad math and other fraudulent information, discarding the inventors’ changes and continuing the fraud.

The cat was almost out of the bag at that time, yet it was almost impossible to believe that these were crimes and not some type of mistakes versus part of an organized criminal syndicate of lawyers and law firms attempting to steal inventions, which only later and still today are being unraveled. At the same time, other information indicating fraud began to surface.

The Arthur Andersen Audit, The Enron Broadband Attempted Technology Transfers,the Collapse of both Enron and Arthur Andersen and the Ties to the Iviewit Inventions:
Another hidden and fraudulent set of events within the Iviewit companies links to Enron Broadband discovered at the same time that Arthur Andersen began a required Audit of the Iviewit Companies performed on behalf of Crossbow Ventures and their corresponding interests of the SBA on their SBIC loans.

Andersen’s Audit discovered identically and similarly named Corporate Shell companies and other misdeeds, as Iviewit also became aware of unauthorized technology transfers taking place by Utley, Dick and Wheeler that included one with Enron Broadband and Blockbuster Video.

Enron Broadband had booked Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in revenue on a future deal with Blockbuster Video to stream full screen full frame video over the Internet, that once the crimes at Iviewit were beginning to be discovered, fell apart overnight. Many of those who fully understand the Enron fraud understand that the Broadband division’s fraud was the “straw that broke the camels back.”

As soon as no technology was to transfer in backdoor secret deals to stream or download the videos due to the investigations, and the scandal was unraveling quickly from the audits findings, everything Enron Broadband and Enron had done had to become extinct overnight. Problem, they already had booked the revenue having forgotten the age-old proverb, “Don't count your chickens before they are hatched”, as greed often blinds the best and brightest too.

I note as an aside that the founder of Blockbuster, Wayne Huizenga and his Son, were the seed investors in the Iviewit companies brought to Iviewit by Proskauer and now named Defendants in my Federal Lawsuit.

Instantly, almost overnight, with discovery of the Iviewit fraud, both Andersen who was in the midst of the Iviewit audit that was revealing fraud and Enron vanished in scandal, in a trail of criminal document shredding to cover their tracks.

Seeing the danger they were in from the exposure of the crimes, our trusted advisors, our retained lawyers and accountants, then began a document shredding of the Iviewit files to rid the evidence of the illegal technology transfers and other evidence revealing their criminal acts.

Similar to what Anderson now describes taking place in the First Department regarding the Cover-Up crimes alleged. According to Iviewit Employees stolen briefcases of cash of investor monies, including the SBA’s money, then used to bribe and attempt to bribe employees to steal proprietary equipment and trade secrets as indicated in one employees written statement contained in the referenced link in my Prepared Statement Submitted to this Committee @http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/SHAREHOLDER%20STATEMENTS%20BOOKMARKED.pdf

Witness testimony on page 10 or found on the Iviewit Homepage under Evidence Link 784. "

Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Proskauer Sucks
Also Check Out www.Iviewit.TV for More on this Proskauer Rose Deceit...
Kenneth Rubenstein
The William Dick Bar Rebuttal from Eliot Bernsten is at the Link Below.

William Dick submitted documents which the patent office claimed where fraudulent which led to suspension and investigation.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2003%2012%20William%20Dick%20Virginia%20Bar%20Complaint%20Response%20BOOKM.pdf

More on MPEG LA, Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Kenneth Rubenstein, Foley and Lardner Law Firm, Intel Corp (INTC), Time Warner, Warner Bros, AOL and More Stealing a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Coding Technology

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/MPEG%20LA

Posted here by

Investigative Blogger

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Proskauer Rose Involved in Fraud on the US Patent Office? Is Proskauer Rose Joseph Leccese Really Looking into the iViewit Case?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:13:00 +0000

"MPEG - Proskauer Rose LLP Stealing Inventions - A fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office by Eliot I. Bernstein on Sunday, January 22nd, 2006 @ 09:21PM www.iviewit.tvMy name is Eliot Bernstein and I am one of the inventors of the Iviewit inventions.

Many of the quotes here are from me and the proof for many of these claims can be found at the www.iviewit.tv website. Simply go to left navigation bar and click on the Supreme Court button and then click on either Appendix C or Exhibit Gallery.

Although voluminous in size, the exhibits are chalk full of evidence and information regarding the ongoing investigations. Also, much can be learned at the Iviewit blog at http://patentgate.blogspot.com .

In response to this post, Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLPtook invention disclosures from Iviewit inventors and patented those concepts into their management referral, Brian Utley's name. Rubenstein also contracted Raymond Joao at the law firm Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel to file the applications, while Rubenstein and Proskauer handled all of the other intellectual property work, including Rubenstein acting as a board member and opining to many investors on the inventions.

Joao worked at the law firm that Kenneth Rubenstein was at immediately prior to his learning of theIviewit inventions, MLGWS and then after learning of the inventions,Rubenstein instantly jumped to Proskauer, a firm that had no other intellectual property department to speak of and had been a real estate firm since the 1800's.

Proskauer Rose had already been retained and began work for Iviewit prior to Rubenstein leaving Meltzer. In fact, Kenneth Rubenstein and Joao were initially represented as Proskauer attorneys, although they were still at Meltzer. Joao filed patents into his own name while retained by Iviewit to file patents as Rubenstein’s lackey. Joao’s patents contained many of the ideas he and Kenneth Rubenstein learned from the Iviewit inventors, the disclosures and business plans of Iviewit.

It is absurd to think that a patent attorney could file any patents in his name without a thorough conflict waiver from all clients and approval from the patent bar. History has never had a case where the patent attorney ran out and filed a blizzard of patents all crossing into his clients patent applications. Joao was also part of an elaborate scheme to move the patents out ofIviewit and into companies that Proskauer set up that had similar and identical names to the Iviewit companies.

Yet, the shareholder of those companies appears to be Proskauer Rose and others, not the true Iviewit shareholders or inventors.

Iviewit shareholders, including the SBA were totally unaware that these similar companies had been set up and unawarethat that similar patents were being filed into these companies with the false inventor BrianUtley, false owners and assignees.

Joao was discovered patenting ideas into his name and other dubious behavior and he was fired for his actions. Proskauer and Utley referred William Dick of Foley and Lardner to replace Joao, Utley stated that Dick was the IBM Far East patent attorney and his very close personal friend.

The original Proskauer attorney, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq.(recently arrested in Del Ray Beach, FL for DUI with bodily injury) failed to disclose that he, Utley and Dick were involved in intellectual property crimes from Utley's former employ, Diamond Turf Equipment owned by Monte Freidkin of Boca Raton.

Friedkin discovered that patents were walking out the door to Utley's sole (souless) name and fired him. It was not learned until Wheeler andUtley's deposition and Dick's response to the Virginia Bar that the three of them had been involved in the crime.

Wheeler set up the company, Dick wrote the patents from Utley's employer secretly into Utley's name at home and Utley got in and stole the inventions from his employer.

This is the same type of scam that they instituted on Iviewit and again appear to be failing achieving their ends. Dick was Joao's replacement and since it was never disclosed by any of them, the fact of their prior past patent theft attempt, Iviewit was dumbfounded to find this prior history out after learning they were stealing Iviewit inventions.

Moreover, Wheeler and Proskauer submitted a resume on Utley that claimed that Diamond Turf went on to be a huge success do to Utley's inventions, when the truth was that the company was instantly closed by Friedkin after he found Utley stealing from his company while acting as the President of Friedkin’s company.

Utley failed to disclose this, Wheeler and Proskauer never disclosed this when Iviewit retained them and Dick and Foley failed to inform us of Dick's past with this group.

This is a criminal organization of patent thieves, they have a history and they are a danger to inventors, good lawyers everywhere and the United States and foreign countries patent systems.

I am not against patent attorneys filing patents as long as there is a hefty review by the patent department or the USTPO OED, to investigate if those attorney inventions lay claim on any client inventions they may have represented or as in our case misrepresented.

It is very dangerous for patent attorneys to be patenting inventions for themselves while representing client interests, and the obvious collusion amongst patent attorneys to work together to steal each others clients inventions remains a gaping hole.

Yet these guys filed false oaths on applications in others names for inventions they learned while retained by the Iviewit inventors,no excuse can be had for this, this is plain theft, fraud on the patent office, fraud on the Iviewit inventors, the Iviewit shareholders and all the EPO foreign offices and the history of the world and invention.

This is not even close to a patent attorney having a novel idea (although that seems far fetched as attorneys are not typically inventive) and then patenting it in his name with no client involved. Joao has stated that some of his inventions were prior to ours and that Iviewit was in fact infringing on his inventions (he claimed this to the New York Supreme CourtAppellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee), yet Joao failed to seek waivers or disclose this in writing or verbally to anyone seems absurd.

I find it further disgusting that MPEG patent inclusion is controlled by a single person, Kenneth Rubenstein, where the temptation is all to obvious.

Patent pooling schemes have been killed historically by the Justice Department for the very reasons that Iviewit complains of, anti-competitive monopolistic practices that violate Sherman and Clayton and almost every antitrust practice. Patent pooling schemes created by lawyers to make money as middlemen also seems to violate ethics.

For instance, how canProskauer and Rubenstein profit from MPEG as counsel for MPEG (as Rubenstein discloses in his deposition at the Iviewit Exhibit gallery) and at the same time take invention disclosure as inventors counsel under Proskauer for review when the patent concepts could completely render MPEG useless, as the Iviewit inventions do, destroying Rubenstein and now PRoskauers pooling schemes?

How can Rubenstein review Iviewit patents for MPEG and at the same time give Iviewit unbiased advice on their patents or control their fate by inclusion or exclusion, while Proskauer and Rubenstein are direct benefactors of the MPEGLA pool profits?

The conflict is as wide as the Grand Canyon, no China Wall, in fact an open door for crime to occur, crimes that violate Article 1, Section 8,Clause 8 inventor protections by those entrusted to protect those rights as part of the patent bar. The obvious is happening here, MPEG andProskauer have found a way to review patents as patent counsel and then steal them as patent poolers looking to profit from others inventions.

The first complaint that was filed at the patent office was in an invention format as a joke, not a joke to laugh at, it was appropriately titled, "System and Method for Committing Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the Iviewit Inventors". I wonder if the patent department will approve it? lol... This is the only thing that Joao,Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Dick, Foley and Lardner, Brian Utley and others accused, ever invented.

Please feel free to contact me for further information or an interview.
wEliot I. BernsteinInventorIviewit Technologies, Inc.
iviewit@iviewit.tv
www.iviewit.tv
http://patentgate.blogspot.com "
r
Source of Post
http://patentgate.blogspot.com/

Posted Here By
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

What is Proskauer Rose Joseph Leccese doing about the MPEG LA corruption and the perjured deposition of Kenneth Rubenstein ?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:38:00 +0000

MPEG LA, LLC - Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney - MPEG LA Stole iViewit Technology and Illegally Patent Pooled the Technology.

Part 2 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rodS_EjIO6M
Part 3 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz58XzqDIOQ
Part 4 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIuERbs40c8
Part 5 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQbmAwr-oto
Part 6 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0_bN7IzaGA

November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose and MPEG LA's Deposition. Rubenstein perjures himself repeatedly regarding acting as Iviewit Patent Counsel, contradicts Christopher Wheeler Deposition Statements and statements made to Judge Jorge Labarga. Labarga had evidence of Perjured statements of Rubenstein and threw the lawsuit as he threw the Bush v. Gore Presidential Election and ended Democracy in the USA.

"Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office " What is Joseph Leccese Doing About it?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:28:00 +0000

Joseph M. Leccese - What is Joseph Leccese Proskauer Rose Doing to "Do the Right Thing" and Obey the Laws of the United States of America and to examine the true, real facts and legal documents from the beginning involving Proskauer Rose, Christopher Wheeler, Matthew Triggs, Kenneth Rubenstein, MPEG LA, Steven C. Krane, Stephen Kaye, and more Proskauer Rose Related Parties. Taking the Domain Names of an Investigative Blogger does NOT change the Truth that Proskauer Rose is GUILTY in their involvement in the iViewit Stolen Technology.

"12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT

LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT

Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing ;

Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.

A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan &; the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.

Anderson’s testimony

http://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htm

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @
http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165

HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY
AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERS

The House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY.

Proskauer Rose

Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC &; FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees. Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer Rose has further direct ties to both the Madoff &; Dreier Ponzis.

NY Attorney General Cuomo

Following the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).

As the Iviewit &; Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.

Anderson’s filing

http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf

Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Andrew Cuomo @

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf "

Source of Post

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288

Mark Sapperstein. Donald Stone Industries Inc. Patent Theft - Polictical Corruption, Maryland Attorney General, Joseph Curran Jr.- Glibert Sapperstein- Mark Sapperstein

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:11:00 +0000

Mark Sapperstein

Stolen Technology - Patent Theft - Political Corruption - Court Corruption - Mark Sapperstein

"Donald Stone asks this court for permission to make a brief Victim Impact Statement as part of the court record at the sentencing hearing of Gilbert Sapperstein."

"Stone has suffered irreparable damage to his patent and intellectual property as a direct result of Gilbert Sapperstein's Criminal Activity for which Gilbert Sapperstein is being Sentenced"

"... a Political Corruption Investigation..."

"Tracing Gilbert Sapperstein and his son Mark Sapperstein's Criminal Activities as far back as the 1980's early 90's..."

This Document Talks about the Connection to Maryland Attorney General Joseph Curran Jr. and the connections to Gilbert Sapperstein and Mark Sapperstein along with co-conspirator Charles R. Longo.

"In late 1991 Donald Stone formed Donald Stone Industries Inc. to commercial a technology Donald Stone had invented. By late 1993 under Stone's leadership, Stone's invention, still in it's infancy appeared to have tremendous potential in a broad spectrum of application. Donald Stone had initiated numerous discussions with major U.S. Corporations. - Mark Sapperstein

Unknown to Stone, the Donald Stone Industries Inc. Corporate Attorney Greg Burgee and his law firm Miles and Stockbridge and the secretarty / treasure of this company Bruff J. Procter wer involved in numerous fraudulant schemes such as money laundering and federal bankruptcy fraud, primarily hiding the assets of the bankruptcies of Charles R. Longo in legitimate business such as Donald Stone Industries Inc." - Mark Sapperstein

Mark Sapperstein

Read Full Mark Sapperstein Document at Link Below

Click Here For Full Document

Foley and Lardner,

Ron Nelson Construction -Montana Contractor. Nelson Construction Montana. Ron Nelson Jehovah's Witness Elder.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sun, 27 Mar 2011 01:30:00 +0000

Coming Soon My Experience with Ron Nelson Construction - Rexford Montana.

Nelson Construction Montana. Ron Nelson Jehovah's Witness Elder Eureka Montana.

Do you have an Experience with Ron Nelson Construction - Rexford Montana.
Nelson Construction Montana to share?

My Experience with Ron Nelson and Insurance Scams, Construction Quality, Flat Out Lies, Over Billing, Tax Fraud, and Much More on the TRUTH of Ron Nelson Construction.

Also Coming Soon RonAndDarcy.com Facts and Documents that expose Ronald J. Nelson a Jehovah's Witness Elder since 1973, of fraud, perjury, and defamation.

More information coming soon on the strong probability that Ron Nelson has bought off attorneys, coerced insurance agents, lied about and falsified documents including appraisals, fraud against the electric company and failure to complete many contractual obligations.

The "Truth" about Jehovah's Witness Elder Ron Nelson Coming Soon.

Email Me your Tip on Ronald Nelson Montana Contractor

Ron Nelson Builder - Ron Nelson Construction

Crystal L. Cox

Real Estate Industry Whistleblower

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

the Shirley Pigott Story, Detect and Fight Fraud in Government

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:43:00 +0000

Fight Government Fraud

"Executive Order by Governor Perry 2004

Detect and Fight Fraud in Government

Each state agency shall comply with the following initiatives and directives to prevent, detect, and eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse in state government. The state agency workgroup shall submit a report to the Office of the Governor. The report shall include:

1. risk assessment tools to help agencies determine vulnerabilities;
2. best practices that eliminate fraud in contracting, contract management and procurement; and
3. common components for fraud prevention and elimination programs.

Each agency must designate a contact person for its fraud prevention and elimination activities; the contact person shall report directly to the agency executive director, commissioner, or board chair.

Each agency shall develop a fraud prevention program that includes, at a minimum, the recommended common components developed by the state agency workgroup. These programs must be in place by October 1, 2004. If an agency already has a fraud prevention and elimination program, the agency shall ensure that its program includes the recommended common components.

Each agency shall review its existing rules, policies, organizational structure and statutes to identify changes needed to better detect and fight fraud.

Each agency shall report its actions to comply with this executive order and any recommended statutory changes to improve its fraud prevention and elimination efforts to the anti-fraud coordinator in the Office of the Governor no later than October 1, 2004.

www.governor.state.tx.us/divisions/press/exorders/rp36 "

http://www.texasmedicalboardwatch.com/id8.html

More to the Story

http://www.scribd.com/Shirley%20Pigott%20MD

http://www.texasmedicalboardwatch.com/

http://texasphoenix007.blogspot.com/2010/01/shirley-pigott-v-state-of-texas.html

http://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2009/05/nightmare-of-dr-shirley-pigott.html

http://www.sunset.state.tx.us/81streports/dps/responses/150.pdf

Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney for MPEG LA - Involves Attorney Raymond Anthony Joao.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:27:00 +0000

Kenneth Rubenstein 's lackey, attorney Raymond Anthony Joao, who was a patent attorney working DIRECTLY under Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein 's direction.

Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.

No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Raymond Joao and Kenneth Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.

Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao

Raymond Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.

More on Raymond Joao Click Here

Source of Above and LOTS More
http://iviewit.tv/about/index.htm

More on Iviewit Massive Shareholder Fraud

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

www.BruceSewell.com

www.iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

posthed here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Perjured Deposition by Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein - MPEG LA Corrupt Patent Pooling.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:52:00 +0000

Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Patent Attorney from Proskauer Rose LLP - Working with MPEG LA. Kenneth Rubenstein Perjured himself in Depositions Regarding the Iviewit Technologies Patents in Which Kenneth Rubenstein was Directly Involved in Derailing the Rightful Inventors to Getting their Rightful Patent.

MPEG LA - with the Help of Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney, Pooled the Technology in patents and well the Iviewit Inventors NEVER got rights or any compensation for the Mult-Trillion Dollar Invention that WE ALL USE.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6 - Final

www.Iviewit.TV
For More on Iviewit

www.ProskauerSucks.com
more on Proskauer Rose Corruption

http://www.kennethrubenstein.com/
more on MPEG LA Corruption and Kenneth Rubenstein
Corrupt Patent Attorney.

posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Massive Liabilities exist for Warner Bros. for their involvement in criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities over Iviewit Scandal

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:07:00 +0000

Iviewit SEC Complaint NAMING Warner Bros. - Time Warner Inc. - Curtis Lu, now General Cousel of Lightsquared and Many Others over a Massive Shareholder Fraud in the Blatant, Obvious Theft of Iviewit Technologies.

" Pages 3-9

o Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.

Warner Bros et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.

Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged Criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of investing $25 Million Dollars of capital to my companies.

When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the Proskauer/Rubenstein/Joao filed patents and Calkins discovered initial evidence of corporate and bankruptcy frauds.

At that time, Warner Bros et al. counsel, including Smith, employees and personnel became aware of frauds relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional information regarding similar corporate frauds was also being unearthed at that time in an audit being conducted by Arthur Andersen (“Andersen”) which will be discussed further herein.

This information of what Smith and Calkin’s had discovered was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Wayne Smith and John Calkins as rational for not going forward on the Private Placement investment.

Colter relayed that Warner Bros et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement whereby the bankruptcy and lawsuits were not disclosed that were later discovered.

The Private Placement Memorandum completed by, billed for and circulated to potential Iviewit investors, including Warner Bros et al., by Proskauer Rose.

The Fraudulent Statements by counsel and others contained in the Wachovia Private Placement, distributed for capital investment is cause for further SEC investigations of these criminal and SEC violations. Further questions arise as to Wachovia’s actions once they too were aware of the Fraud.

Per Colter, Warner Bros et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.

Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.

Harry Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE allegedly committed by attorneys registered with the Federal Patent Bar.

Harry Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office that resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.

Harry Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.

Amazingly, the patent office initial information which led to suspension proved that materially false information on the patents was not only given to the US Patent Office but that similar false information was given by Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer to Wachovia Securities for inclusion into the Private Placement Memorandum.

Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by counsel Proskauer.

Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO and ANTITRUST crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement, further false statements in a securities document.

At the time, I retained independent counsel, Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire to investigate the corporate and patent fraud allegations and it was confirmed that there was a bankruptcy filing and lawsuit that were not disclosed to Wachovia or Iviewit’s Board and Management that were not part of the conspiratorial efforts.

It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose and had stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.

Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds, found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.

The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office, the SEC through actions involving the Boca Raton Police Department (“Boca PD”) to be discussed in detail herein and other investigators.

Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose Law Firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and this was the supposed reason he want Kenneth Rubenstein, MPEG LA Patent Attorney... to re-opine.

The SEC should note here that in addition to the US Patent Office OED investigation of Rubenstein, Rubenstein also is under investigation with other attorneys, including Joao, all ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of Five Justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department.

Investigations ordered for “Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety” when a Proskauer partner, Steven C. Krane, violated public office rules at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee.

Krane caught handling Iviewit/Proskauer complaints, in order to block the complaints against his partner Kenneth Rubenstein and his firm Proskauer Rose, concealing the massive conflict he had as an Officer of the First Department Disciplinary Committee and other conflicts from other ethical public office positions he maintains in New York, while remaining a Proskauer partner.

After discovery of the alleged Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, Iviewit learned later that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros., was now working with Rubenstein who was Iviewit’s former IP counsel, MPEGLA counsel and Warner Bros. counsel.

Whereby, upon Smith’s request for Kenneth Rubenstein to re-opine, Rubenstein claimed he was conflicted with Warner Bros. et al. and Iviewit and therefore could not opine, including even to reiterate his prior opinion, as already evidenced herein.

Whereby Warner Bros. et al. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of the Binding Signed Agreements.
The DVD6C, MPEGLA LLC and other patent pooling schemes, where Warner Bros. and Proskauer are major participants[10], for example in the DVD6C pool which are managed and monetized by Warner Bros., Proskauer and Rubenstein.

The pooling schemes are alleged to be merely artifices to STEAL INVENTIONS FROM INVENTORS in violation of multiple Antitrust laws and have illegally precluded me from market in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities, including death threats and a car bomb.

The Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in and inuring benefit from are also using the technologies in violation of Signed and Binding Contracts and Licensing Agreements, admittedly.

Yet, since that time Warner Bros. have also excluded Iviewit from market tying and bundling the technologies in their licensing schemes, again in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 years of knowing infringement and the Massive Liabilities to Shareholders that mounts daily.

Click Here for Official Fingerprinted Iviewit Document "

More on Iviewit Patent Theft

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.iViewit.TV

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

www.BruceSewell.com

The Department of Justice DOES not Seem to Seek Justice and Taxpayer Pay the Bill.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:33:00 +0000

Bankruptcy Corruption is Rampant in the US Bankruptcy Courts and When Bankruptcy Whistleblower - Bankruptcy Fraud Insiders Bring the TRUTH .. with "Without a Doubt Proof " to the Attention of the Bankruptcy Judge, the Department of Justice Trustee or Even the FBI, Well NONE of the "Officials" who are Legally suppose to oversee the Bankruptcy Process... actually Listen to that TRUTH .. as well if they do then the Money.. the Perks.. the Bonuses .. Well they can kiss that Goodbye..

My Guess is even if their are honest DOJ Trustees and Bankruptcy Judges.. well they would not stand a chance in the Wall of Corruption that the Bankruptcy Courts is seeing... the Money is to Good and Well YOU had BETTER not Stand in front of that Gravy Train or those on the Inside will do whatever it takes to Ruin Your Quality of Life.. Set You Up.. Jail You .. put you in a Mental Institute. .. Subject you To Economic Terrorism and Ruin your Reputation ...

Article Below on Dept. of Justice Wasteful Spending Going after the Wrong "Bad Guys".

" Politicians, Press Cheat Taxpayers By Ignoring DOJ's Wasteful Witch-hunts

By Andrew Kreig

Washington Post columnist David Broder cited New Jersey's freshman Gov. Chris Christie as a role model for Pennsylvania's Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Corbett, who similarly boasts of a platform to limit government and fight crime.

But Broder got the Christie story completely backward in his Sept. 2 column. The influential pundit described Corbett, his state's attorney general and also a former U.S. attorney, this way:

His claim to fame is that his investigations of corrupt legislators have so far sent several of them to jail. In this race, he has modeled himself on Chris Christie, the freshman governor of New Jersey, promising, as Christie did, to oppose new taxes and shrink state government.

Far from limiting government, Christie, right, wasted vast amounts of taxpayer funds to help himself and his cronies.

Look no farther than his scheme as U.S. attorney to connive with Solomon Dwek, a big-time bank swindler and brothel operator, to crush political opponents with criminal charges timed to explode at the beginning of the 2009 Christie campaign.

The Christie-and-Dwek tale recounted below illustrates why we need more investigative reporting in politics as this year's election season heats up. Pundits seldom deign to discuss obvious dirty tricks, much less the deviltry from unwarranted criminal charges against political targets to destroy them and their families as part of an election strategy.

On Sept. 12, legal commentator Roger Shuler used evidence from this report to author on his blog Legal Schnauzer, "Stench Becomes Overwhelming in U.S. Justice System."

Source of Post and More ..
http://www.justice-integrity.org/

For More on Bankruptcy Corruption and How it Leads to Other "Witch Hunts" in the Corrupt US Bankruptcy Courts .. Check Out

www.STOPpettersScam.com

www.Petters-Fraud.com

www.Summit1031bkJustice.com

and Watch the Tom Petters Fraud Movie
www.SecondFraud.com

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Fraud Experts Decry Federal Self-Dealing After $3.6 Billion Ponzi Aftermath - Bankruptcy Corruption.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:17:00 +0000

"Corporate turn-around expert William Procida and hedge fund founder Thane Ritchie were DC Update guests Sept. 2 on the My Technology Lawyer Radio Network as they provided first-hand accounts of federal court irregularities in Minnesota that they claim victimize lenders and investors in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in U.S. history.

During the show, they told co-hosts from the Justice Integrity Project and network founder Scott Draughon about why they’re speaking out against federally orchestrated injustices hurting the fraud victims of Minnesota businessman Thomas J. Petters.

The latter’s Ponzi scheme discovered in 2008 caused estimated damages of $3.65 billion ─ including to lenders and investors in such Petters-controlled companies as Polaroid, Sun Country Airlines and the distributor Fingerhut. Ritchie claims more than $220 million in loans and interest at serious risk.

“I’ve never seen a criminal’s attorney be a receiver,” Procida says of disputed court orders that made former Petters defense attorney Douglas Kelley receiver and also the U.S. trustee.

The court also gave Kelley “judicial immunity,” thereby limiting victim oversight of his controversial decisions.

-- Andrew Kreig "

Source
www.Justice-Integrity.org

Also Check Out Site on Tom Petters Bankruptcy Fraud
www.Petters-Fraud.com and

Check out the Tom Petters Fraud Movie
www.SecondFraud.com

Stop Bankruptcy Fraud and Stop Bankruptcy Corruption. Watch the Second Fraud Movie - Tom Petters Fraud.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:29:00 +0000

The Second Fraud Movie
Banned From Minnesota TelevisionStop Bankruptcy Fraud

www.SecondFraud.com

Polaroid Bankruptcy

Doug Kelley Petters Attorney

Bankruptcy Attorney Take the Money and Leave NONE for The Creditors.

The Department of Justice Trustee Turns a Blind Eye.

Bankruptcy Corruption is Rampant.

Watch the Second Fraud and Learn More How Corruption Works in the Bankruptcy Courts.

Bankruptcy Fraud Corruption seems to Be Legal, ALL you Need is a Judge, a Department of Justice Trustee and well the FBI Does not really care .. all they need is an indictment and the FBI does not even interfere Key Witnesses as we seen in the 40 Million Dollar Summit 1031 Bankruptcy.

Bankrupty Court is Big Business and in this Business of Going Bankrupt, Everybody wins but the Victims.. the "Creditors" - the Money was there but the Corruption in Bankruptcy Take the Money, pay off the Corrupt DOJ Trustee, Pay Off local judges, set up whistleblowers and rake in hundreds of millions.. All while the US Bankruptcy Courts aid and abett their blatant White Collar Crime.

The FBI says they don't know or care about where the money goes after the bankruptcy is filed, they just go after the source company and look for illusionary indictments and never really prove where the money went. ... that the Bankruptcy Courts took after the Company Filed Bankruptcy...

Time to STOP Corruption in the Bankruptcy Courts...

Check Out

www.Petters-Fraud.com

Also

www.Justice-Integrity.org
Justice Integrity Project

FTC Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:55:00 +0000

Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?

Over a Decade. WHAT !!

Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???

"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5. Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of Docket 9341 discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.

Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.

Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.

Three Components of Monopoly Recovery

Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:

1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis. See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.
SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys

2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.

3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost. Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check. Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues
from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.

Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act

Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials. That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric. Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.

Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels. Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.

Rebate values are sustained from back in time with forward time purchase agreements. Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences. Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels. PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.

This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel. That is the nature of the charge back; for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows through PC Companies to Intel. Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer product flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule.

SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys ""

Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22? Intel Closed Door Settlements with the FTC? Intel Executive Amnesty???

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:08:00 +0000

"FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22?

Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.

Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.

This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.

Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.

Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.

This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.

In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.

In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.

That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.

I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.

Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.

June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.

Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.

And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.

Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.

The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.

This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.

Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.

FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.

Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.

A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.

A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.

Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.

A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.

No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.

Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.

Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.

Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.

Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.

The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.

Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.

Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.

Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.

All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:

In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.

Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.

Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.

Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.

Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...

Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy

posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Disbar the Florida Bar. Time for Accountability from Florida Attorneys. Demand Integrity and that Florida Attorneys are NOT above the Law.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:38:00 +0000

"As a Director of Baron’s Stores, Inc., I am responsible for assisting in the wind down following Baron’s liquidated Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The Florida Bar, in my opinion, has engaged in criminal activity, which has interfered with my ability to fulfill my fiduciary responsibilities.

The alleged criminal activities include a breach of the following:

Honest Services
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Racketeering
Mail Fraud, and
Sherman Anti Trust

The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state. John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.

Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company. As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade.

Earlier this year, I penned an OpEd piece for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel outlining what I had learned about the Florida Bar. The response from the community was overwhelming and immediate.

As a result of conversations with Florida lawyers, and insurance professionals, as well as my fiduciary responsibilities in having to deal with the courts, “Disbar The Florida Bar,” was born.

This non-profit 501(c)(4) corporation was formed to cause the removal of The Florida Bar as the controlling and regulatory entity for Florida lawyers and to re-create a level playing field for all Florida attorneys and their clients.

I am seeking input from others in the state of Florida
who feel that they have been wronged by The Florida Bar.

This input will be aired through live interviews on WZAB 880 AM Miami every weekday from 2:00 – 3:00 PM., thru Thursday, May 13, 2010. Call 305-773-5167 to discuss your experiences with the Florida Bar on the air.

The show will also host interviews with candidates vying for State offices, members of the Judiciary, Executive and Legislative branches, as well as Law Professors, Insurance Executives, and other professionals.

The objective is to educate the public about issues with The Florida Bar, both as a regulatory agency under The Supreme Court of Florida, and an Association/Union mandating membership in a Right to Work state. If you would like to be interviewed, please click the contact link.

We already have numerous attorneys lined up to come forward to tell their story of how The Florida Bar has used the disciplinary process against them while allowing unethical attorneys, insured by FLMIC, to go unpunished.

Hopefully, with enhanced public awareness, attorneys and elected officials will act to remove The Florida Bar and The Florida Bar’s connections from power. "

Link to Source of Post

http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=94

Click Here to Learn More About "Disbar the Florida Bar".

Have Tips On Florida Corruption?

Email Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Information on the Florida Bar, the Florida Supreme Court and Florida Attorneys that are Corrupt and helped to cover up a Trillion Stolen Patent of the Iviewit Technology Company ( Iviewit Invention, Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Company)
go to www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Time to Disbar the Florida Bar. STOP Criminal Activity Among the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:15:00 +0000

When is Enough really Enough?

The Florida Bar seems to constantly protect illegal activity among Florida Attorneys, to the point of a Trillion Dollar patent theft in which will soon take the investment portfolios of many shareholders of Warner Bros. , Intel, Time Warner Inc. , AOL and More involved in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technlogies Stolen Patent.

More on the Involvement of the Florida Courts and the Florida Bar in the aiding and abetting of stealing a Trillion Dollar Patent at: www.Iviewit.TV - www.DeniedPatent.com -

Time to STOP Corruption in the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

Time for Accountable among Florida Attorneys.

Click Here to Listen to Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Show

"" The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state.

John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.

Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company.

As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade. ""

Other Links on
Iviewit Technologies and the Corrupt Florida Bar

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=the-florida-bar

http://miamimirror.blogspot.com/2010/01/formal-complaint-lodged-with-florida.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+%22florida+bar%22+%22iviewit%22&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/02/greenberg-traurig-openingly-stands-in.html

http://www.industrywhistleblower.tv/2010/02/list-of-parties-named-in-eliot.html

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2009/12/iviewit-holdings-inc-conflict-of.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/02/florida-bar-under-fire-for-lack-of.html

http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/response-to-why-data-compression-news.html

http://www.bankruptcytrusteefraud.com/2010/03/fbi-coverups-boca-police-scandals-major.html

Mark Neuman - Summit 1031 Rats out Lane Lyons and Threatens to Tell on Tim Larkin and Brian Stevens. Summit 1031 Exchange Bankrupcty.

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:15:00 +0000

So Per the Email from Mark Neuman - Summit Principal To Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung... what DID Lane Lyons REALLY Do in his "tenure" that is not in line with how he's trying to portray his role?

Apparently Lane Lyons has Lied to Authorities about what His Real Role at Summit 1031 - Summit Accommodators Inc. was. so Lane originally bought in for around $500,000 right? and His Deposition and .. well more on ALL that Later.

Now Daddy, Mark Neuman Knew - so He Aided and Abetted, and he had this information - this Secret Detailed List.. which he concealed from the Authorities, as a Back up To Defend Himself Should the "Others" Turn On Him.

Lane Lyons - Summit 1031 Principle knows that Mark Neuman has this over him - so he won't Rat Out - Summit 1031 Principle Mark Neuman. Now Mark Neuman and Brian Stevens Have Plenty on Each Other So they have a "Code of Silence" as Well.

eMail Excerpt Regarding Lane Lyons ..

Mark Neuman SAYS..
March 7, 2010 9:48:47 PM

"Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Exchange Principle Says "

" It didn't make me cry nor fall into despair.

I'm comfortable with where I'm at at this moment.

If I'm letting Crystal get to me, how could I not let Padrick and his gang get to me?

And I'm just not going to cross that line
on the other principals.

I know what I can pull out in the end if I had to...... and they will certainly
deserve it then if they abandoned me.

But should we be making them the bad guys cause they don't want to get in this brawl?

Pitting us against each other plays right into what the DOJ and Padrick all want.

Get them fighting amongst each other and it takes pressure off of them.

I would put more credence in it, but there really isn't much to pit against each other.

I know very well what Lane did in his tenure
is not in line
with how he's trying to portray his role.

I have the list- yes, an actual list
and it gets longer as I review emails and such.

So tell me this.

Do you think that your blogs will expose it and somebody from the DOJ will just show up someday and charge them?

This is how I pictured it.

The blogs keep spreading information and the Internet public that ties in watches...... and the DOJ watches, the creditors committee watches.... they all watch. "

Click Below for More on this Email
from Mark Neuman to Stephanie DeYoung ..
including what Stephanie Said Before This..
Look Close.. Got a Tip?
Email Me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

http://www.summit1031sucks.com/2010/03/correct-me-if-i-am-wrong-i-know-you.html

So Again Lane Lyons,Tim Larkin, Brian Stevens, Mark Neuman:
Is it One of You Going to Prison
Or is it ALL Of You.

Lane Lyons - Summit 1031 Principal, You may want to think Seriously about Cutting a Deal with the FBI to Tell on Mark Neuman.. for What he has on YOU insures his Freedom if He Beats you to the FBI.

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Posted By
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

PS. Are you Guys Starting to See How Good I am yet? You Better Get Your Passport and Running Shoes Ready.. NOTHING will STOP this Shit Storm...

Also Just How Dumb are You Guys?

Do you Know that the FBI can get, watch, look at, MONITOR All of Your Emails LEGALLY without asking YOU or informing YOU.. How Many More Incriminating Emails Have you Dumb Asses Sent... .. Too Funny Really .. Can't Wait to See em' in the Press..

Should have Walked your Ass over to Stephanie's office and said this in Person instead of Email it and Incriminating Yourself.. Mark Neuman..

Here you Brilliant Financial Minds are Thinking the FBI has taken so Long.. so you must be in the Clear.. TRUTH is.. they were watching your Dumb Ass Moves and Confessions... ALL of Them.. I Know My Phones are Tapped, and My Emails Monitored.. that is Just Common Sense... This is a High Finance, White Collar Crime and you are Criminals...

You - Brian Stevens, Lane Lyons, Mark Neuman, Tim Larkins have taken Joy, Peace of Mind, Happiness, Choice and Freedom from 106 Victims and ALL Related Parties.

You do not Get Joy, Peace of Mind, Happiness, Choice and Freedom FOR You.. after Doing Such a Horrific Act.. So thanks for the Last Year.. Been Fun.. Enjoy Prison and Now the Wives and Relatives that Know and Have for the Last Year and most likely longer.. the TRUTH .. well they get some White Collar Crime Charges as Well.

Even When you are In Prison, I will Continue to BLOG and Expose WHERE your Money ALL is Hidden, this way when you get out.. IT will NOT Be There.

Oh and For THOSE Of You - Brian Stevens, Lane Lyons, Mark Neuman, Tim Larkins - Wondering .. YES the Department of Justice and the IRS is Reading Every Word, and Of Course You know My Number One fan is Obsidian Finance Group... so YOUR Game is OVER !!!

Drop to your Knees Mark Neuman and
Beg for Forgiveness - for Mercy..

Creditors: It's Pay Back Time...

Summit 1031 Exchange, Summit Accommodators Principle Mark Neuman Rats out Lane Lyons and the "others" and Mark Neuman SAYS they "deserve it".

noreply@blogger.com (Crystal L. Cox) — Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:15:00 +0000

Bend Oregon News

Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Principle Confesses to Bankruptcy Whistleblower Daughter, Stephanie Studebaker-Deyoung that he indeed knew that Lane Lyons, Summit 1031 Principal Lied about his REAL role at Summit Accommodators - Summit 1031 out of Bend Oregon.

Was this the First that Bankruptcy Whistleblower Stephanie DeYoung Knew?

The Summit 1031 Exchange Bankruptcy has 106 victims and their families that are devasted for over 15 months now from the White Collar Crime and Corruption of what I Call the Bend Oregon Mafia - Summit Accommodators, Summit 1031 Exchange - Summit Principals: Tim Larkin, Mark Neuman, Lane Lyons, and Brian Stevens.

Here is the Email from Daddy, Mark Neuman to Daughter Stephanie DeYoung.
She Sent it to Me.. to Defend the Creditors..

March 7, 2010
9:48:47 PM

" I know very well what Lane did in his tenure is not in line with how he's trying to portray his role. I have the list- yes, an actual list and it gets longer as I review emails and such.

So tell me this.

Do you think that your blogs will expose it and somebody from the DOJ will just show up someday and charge them?

This is how I pictured it. "

Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox has This Email Conversation,
Complete with headers, IP addresses, Forwards and All.

Funny Mark Neuman, this Indeed is How I pictured it.

So Let's See How it Works as the Next Few Days and Weeks paints a Very Different Side to the Summit 1031 Bankrupty out of Bend Oregon.

Will the DOJ just show up and Charge them
as Mark Neuman Summit 1031 Principle "Pictured It" ?

more on This Confession Email at
http://www.summit1031sucks.com/2010/04/so-per-email-linked-below-what-did-lane.html

For More on this Breaking Summit 1031 Scandal
GO to www.Summit1031Sucks.com
Over the Next Few Weeks Tons will Come out
on the Behind the Scenes of the Summit 1031
Bankruptcy Corruption Scandal.

Lots More Emails and Secrets Coming Soon !!!

Posted Here by Industry Whistleblower
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox